Direkt zum Hauptbereich

Being there (Hal Ashby, 1979)

A very simple-minded gardener is turned out of his house when his master dies and in search for a TV set he encounters fame and fortune.


This very beautiful, quietly set film is a tour de force of Peter Sellers' comic timing. His character is slow and mostly repeats what everybody says around him. This doesn't only lead to great comic moments, but renders the whole spectacle into a farcical satire. I enjoyed Sellers' dead-pan performance a lot and was amazed by the careful balance that Ashby manages to give the portrayal of the character. Most of the times I was meandering between pity, amusement and even a bit of cringing at Chancy's outrageous actions, or rather, non-actions.

The film is deliberately paced very slowly but has meticulous attention to details in the set and the production design. Many fabulous long shots introduce the characters in their respective settings and leave it up to the actors to fill those lush sets with life. The camera also deserves the notion "dead-pan" - there are few movements, pans and dollies I could remember. I like this tableau-setup of the camera very much, I call them "rectangular shots", lining up the camera in right angle (or sometimes to a 45 degree angle) towards the dominating wall, essentially closing most frames.

The dialogue is cut in standard shot-reverse-shot editing. But as the story progresses, the doctor who is mostly a silent witness to these exchanges is cut to in a close up, detailing his reaction and his mounting skepticism.

Most of the shots set the stage for a coming scene but a few of them used the style of long shots to emphasize a joke or a punch line, like the last shot.

Kommentare

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

Detour (Ulmer, 1945) #TSPDT #390

A hitchhiker is picked up by death and then picks up his personal tormenting devil. The plot looked fairly straightforward, but the magic of this gem is that the story strand convolutes until it tightens into a strangling gordic knot - which is pretty much exactly what happens towards the end. The flashback structure are very noir-ish, so was the plot - everything straight down, right from the beginning. I really rooted for the guy to get out of this situation, but every time he takes a decision it actually gets worse - so in the end I was just hoping he might die and get relieved. Most striking was the jaw-dropping performance of Ann Savage. She pops out about a mile and her character is rendered so immensely unlikeable that I wondered that she has not been called the godmother of a new type of acting school (maybe she was?) This is definitively a film worth studying again. Its shortness does nothing to diminish the impact and it is rich on details.

Time of the Gypsies / Dom Za Vesanje (Emir Kusturica, 1988)

A supernaturally gifted boy from a Gypsy community is forced to survive in the world of crime. The intriguing qualities of Kusturica's films I've seen is his relentless depiction of basically crazy communities. Not just agreeably potty, they're usually outright interstellar-nuts. Here, he follows the fate of the rather harmless boy Perhan, that leaves for Italy in hope of a better future for him and his loved ones. There are some enormously interesting images in the film that kept ringing long after. The ritual in the river and the last scene in the church ruin (with a horse standing somewhere far back in the image...). After sketchily mapping out the scenes it is surprising how rigorously three-acty the screenplay is constructed. The first act seems quite long in terms of time and number of scenes, but there is also a lot of imagery spent on depicting life in this crazy universe, which makes the second part in Italy much more believable. And there is a certa...

Scarface (de Palma, 1982) - TSPDT #490

A cuban refugee wreaks havoc on Miamis drug industry and realizes his version of the American Dream. The main character is really something - the acting is great and the character suffers from the most fatal of all flaws: He cannot lie - although in a practical sense he does exactly that. So his attacks on the american society he has worked so hard to become a part of work really great - he has a deep insight but at the same time he is hypocrite enough to fall in the same trap in a way. The only time when I felt that the script had to "pull" a little to take the story where it wanted it is when Tony's mother calls to ask about his sister. Her character was a little too much on hating Tony.