Direkt zum Hauptbereich

Das Testament des Dr. Mabuse / The Testament of Dr. Mabuse (Fritz Lang, 1933)

The mad doctor is in an asylum scribbling down instructions for the perfect crime while somebody seems to make those plans come alive.



The film has a certain entertainment value and some funny ideas in it, although it had the feeling of a routine work, although being on a very high standard. It combines the early genre of psychothriller, crime and maybe a bit of the imagery of expressive and noir-ish cinema.

The characters are all played way over the top and have stage-like mannerisms in most of the scenes. This took me a while to get used to, but it doesn't keep the film from being highly enjoyable. Also, there is a whodunnit quality to the first half of the film which - for the modern viewer at least - is way too easy to guess around. Although the motivation of the evil doctor becomes only clear at the end: knowing that his life is coming to an end, he decides to transfer his sinister plans to paper and his evil soul onto an innocent (?) bystander.



The first scene of the film is a shining example of suspense: The camera slowly tracks through a room full of strange equipment, accompanied by the loud pumping of heavy machinery when it suddenly pans to a man hiding in there. When two strangers walk in the man quickly hides behind a big chest. Although the men see his shoes peeking out from behind, they silently decide to pretend not to have noticed anything. After they leave the room, we can see both sides of the door, the two men and the hidden man trying to decide what to do. Without a single spoken word the suspense kept me on the edge of the chair.

There are many more ideas like that in the film, some of them work better, some a bit worse. Had the story been a bit stronger in terms of motivation, this film would have been a masterpiece.

Kommentare

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

They drive by night (Walsh, 1940) #DTC #161

Two truck-driving brothers dream of a better future and financial independence in a sea of good and bad fortune.

Although the film has all the ingredients of a film noir, like the selfish femme fatale, Bogart, and many night scenes, this is something you could consider a feel-good movie. It pretty much surprised me with its turns and twists and I also wasn't prepared in the least to see Bogart as the sidekick, instead of the lead.

In terms of interesting characters, Ida Lupino as the selfish wife that tries to seduce George Raft's Joe she is definitively at the most intense when she slowly sheds all the layers of sanity towards the end. Although her motives are a bit unclear - the amazing thing about her behavior is that she values love over money. In that perspective the movie feels like a tragedy, as (except for the loan shark) everybody has comparatively sophisticated understanding of emotion and life.

Au revoir les enfants (Louis Malle, 1987)

During second world war the monk running a boarding school for upper-class kids hides Jewish kids.

This highly personal movie is very touching and manages to avoid all the pitfalls of being overly emotional. Music and editing are very subdued and carefully used to underline situations. This makes the story ring true (which it was) and gives the viewer good time to settle into the universe that these kids live in.

There are many quite complicated scenes and I was interested in one particular: When Jean gets invited on parent's day by the mother of his new best friend into a posh restaurant. In that very restaurant there are Nazis at one side of the room and an elderly Jew sitting on the other side. The table of the family is right inbetween. Many things about France during the war are told during this scene, I'll just try and focus on camera placement.


The focus shifts twice in the scene: From the family table to the French Jew's table  (who I have been told wears the red …

Glory (1989, Edward Zwick)

A young commander in the civil war is asked to recruit and lead the first all-black Confederate battalion into the Civil War.

I am not too interested in details of the American Civil War but the film managed to stir my interest in some ways. I might want to look up the difference in treatment of the many Chinese laborers that were employed in the development of the West and what kind of legacy this particular group of people has to suffer from in contrast to the better-known fate of African-Americans.

There are some interesting scenes in the film. I decide to examine the battle scene in the beginning. It introduces Broderick's character as a naive and brave but inexperienced soldier - a great choice of casting, especially in contrast to the hardened appearance of Washington. According to imdb footage was used from re-enactment groups and intercut with the staged film.

Before the battle scene commences Broderick walks in row of soldiers and talks over the pictures of the gathering…