Direkt zum Hauptbereich

The Paradine Case (Alfred Hitchcock, 1947)

A lawyer falls in love with the woman he is supposed to defend in a murder case.



This highly entertaining movie was not as consistent story-wise as some of the other of Hitchcock's movies that I've seen. There is still a bit of Freudian over-interpretation in some of the actions that the characters did. But nevertheless, I enjoyed it - I would have loved to see more of Laughton's performance, him being one of my favorite actors in films from that time. (Especially in This Land is Mine, a Renoir film, unfortunately forgotten by and large).


I wanted to look a bit at Hitchcock's camera work in one scene. Peck has been traveling to his client's home to investigate and encounters the mysterious "gardener" and personal butler of the deceased for the first time. But the gardener has been avoiding the lawyer and suddenly shows up at his hotel room during a stormy night.

The camera is quite mobile in this scene and it is fascinating to watch how the image has been framed using props, or better: one prop - the lampshade.



Peck studies some papers. He is disturbed by some banging on wood. The music is tense.

Cam starts high up. Dollies and cranes towards the table. The lampshade is the point of reference in the otherwise very dark room. It will reappear in most of the shots.

The shutter is banging against the window frame.

A static cutaway, revealing the window frame and at the same time establishing the "Entry door" into the scene.

He gets up from the table and fixes the window. The moment he sits down, he hears another knock, this time it's distinctly human.

The camera dollies and pans with Peck as he walks to the window. Then it goes back with him as he sits down at the table again. It reverses the whole movement back.

The knock is coming from the other window. (?) A fixed camera pan reveals the other window (same ugly curtain).

He gets up and opens the curtains in one swift motiion

Again the camera pans and dollies with Peck's movements.
(It is a bit unclear, which of the two windows he opens)
The gardener stands outside the window, transfixing Peck.

A reveal of the new character - the lighting on him is moody and dangerous. It comes from the side, not from the window.

The lawyer's reaction is subdued.
(He lets the man come inside)
Reverse shot on the reaction in close up, but low angle.

He asks the gardener to come in. They have a conversation in which Peck wants to know how the gardener found him.

The camera is on Peck as before (The pipe is gone) and at the end of the dolly the two end up with the lampshape right in the middle.

The gardener states his intention that the visit might be good. He is asked to sit down.

A medium shot, the lamp covering a good third of the screen in the foreground. The camera then dollies back and reveals the two sitting down.

Here the two are sitting practically opposite of the table.

They discuss.

A back and forth of medium close-ups of the two.
Peck gives a little speech about his client. He seems to get a bit upset. The second medium close-up starts to move between 3-points that Peck is moving around the room.
1. Getting up
2. Standing in front of the gardener
3. Standing behind the gardener.
The interesting thing is that the motion is reversed the moment it has ended.

The last position is again Peck facing his guest, but this time the shot is a little wider.

What is interesting about this move is the speed of the camera inbetween points. It feels almost like he could have cut it.
The butler makes his point.

Medium close-up. And countershot of a medium, when Peck turns his back to the camera.

Peck returns to the table and sits down. They seem to decide to finally exchange some information. Peck even offers a cigarette.

From the last POV on Peck the camera dollies backwards with Peck leaning on the chair, then sitting down, leveling the two men.
But the gardener makes a point of not smoking.

Close-ups of the two. The camera is much closer now. There is standard back-and-forth cutting now.

The gardener makes accusations against his former mistress.

The two are sitting much closer now. The lampshade only hangs in from above the frame.

Peck gets up in anger.

The camera follows him in close-up.

The butler also gets up in anger. He calls Mrs. Paradine "evil". As a consequence, Peck opens the window again and shows the man out.

The camera follows him too, but dollies back to reveal both of them standing very close together.

Peck then walks towards the window and opens it.

But the camera stays with the butler, accompanies him to the window, where they have another exchange (with switched sides) and then stays on Peck's back.

Kommentare

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

Time of the Gypsies / Dom Za Vesanje (Emir Kusturica, 1988)

A supernaturally gifted boy from a Gypsy community is forced to survive in the world of crime. The intriguing qualities of Kusturica's films I've seen is his relentless depiction of basically crazy communities. Not just agreeably potty, they're usually outright interstellar-nuts. Here, he follows the fate of the rather harmless boy Perhan, that leaves for Italy in hope of a better future for him and his loved ones. There are some enormously interesting images in the film that kept ringing long after. The ritual in the river and the last scene in the church ruin (with a horse standing somewhere far back in the image...). After sketchily mapping out the scenes it is surprising how rigorously three-acty the screenplay is constructed. The first act seems quite long in terms of time and number of scenes, but there is also a lot of imagery spent on depicting life in this crazy universe, which makes the second part in Italy much more believable. And there is a certa

Prisoners (Villeneuve, 2013)

I haven't seen many of Villeneuve's movies, but I really like everything so far. When thinking about Prisoners after a few days, there was a particular scene that somehow kept returning to my memory: When Gyllenhal's character is introduced, sitting alone in Chinese restaurant, not-flirting with the waitress. For some reason this scene struck me as "different". That gave me the idea to examine all the first appearances of the characters in the movie. ( SPOILERS )   KELLER DOVER (Hugh Jackman) - we don't actually see him, we start with a very static shot into the forest. The man is looking into the forest, it is his POV (which we find out quickly). But we can hear him praying, while a deer walks into the frame. When the camera pulls back, a rifle points at the animal. And just after "Amen", a shot is fired. Now, here's a little surprise: Keller, who was doing the praying has his son RALPH (Dylan Minette) shooting the rifle. It's a fat

007 Thunderball (Terence Young, 1965)

Bad guy steals atom bombs and hides them close to a seaside resort. James Bond saves the day and every woman from virginity. This shot was used a couple of times. After not having watched this in a long time I was amazed at how strange the 60's Bond comes across. For my taste, the Bonnery character is just a bit too plump verbally in his predatory attacks on just any woman he encounters. Many of the quips that must have been hilarious during the day come across as quite dumb now - even when looking at it as a period piece.... but who knows what the socially accepted standards were 1965 for the mating dance in England? Still it is an enjoyable movie - the villain is straightforward evil, the girls are beautiful, smart and opportunistic and the men are sex- and power-hungry (and quite stupid). The world of James Bond. The final battle scene under-water is still jaw-dropping to watch. Just to set up the scene the director had to solve a load of problems: Orientation and light